jus505 All Assignments week 1 to 8

  jus505 All Assignments week 1 to 8

                Click Link Below To Buy:

http://hwcampus.com/shop/jus505-assignments-week-1-8/

Contact Us:

Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com

Week 1
Details:
Write an essay (500-750 words) on the constitutionality of the plea bargaining process. Be sure to do the following:
Your essay should include an analysis of the Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622 (2002), in which the court held that prosecutors need not inform defendants about the disparity during negotiations involved in the plea bargaining process. Give your reaction to this ruling.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of prosecutors and defense attorneys being able to use plea bargaining. How do their goals differ? Describe whether you feel these advantages and disadvantages weigh into the constitutionality of the practice.
Use the GCU eLibrary to locate two to three authoritative, scholarly articles to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Details:

As a graduate student at GCU, it is vitally important for you to know how to conduct research using the GCU eLibrary. Before you begin the assignment, be sure to access and read JUS 505: Library Resource.
Access the GCU eLibrary and locate five peer-reviewed articles on the effectiveness and usefulness of the juvenile justice system.
Copy and paste the citations and abstracts of each article into a Word document.
Submit the assignment to the instructor for feedback on the quality of the sources selected. Use this feedback to revise your search for articles to use in the essay assignment in Module 6.

week 2

Details:

For this assignment, you will construct a cross-sectional jury according to jury empanelment requirements as established by such rulings as Taylor v. Louisiana.
Use the following items to complete the assignment:

1. The John Morgan Case Study.
2. The 2010 U.S. Census data found at http://www.census.gov/2010census/data/
3. Other demographic data found at http://fedstats.sites.usa.gov/ .

Look up the Census and other demographic data for the county in which you live. Imagine John Morgan is being tried for his accused crime in your county.
Construct a jury consisting of 12 jurors who will decide John Morgan’s case. Write a brief description of each juror (a short paragraph for each) that includes his or her name, age, race, gender, educational and income level, and any other information you feel is important to portray each juror. Be sure that the jury you create represents an appropriate cross-section given John Morgan’s information and the other data you have collected.
Write an explanation (250-500 words) as to how the jury you construct represents an appropriate cross-section of John Morgan’s peers. Use the data in your findings and any other appropriate information to defend your rational.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

John Morgan Case Study

John Morgan is a single 38-year-old white male. His formal education consists of a high school diploma and a few semesters of college, but no college degree. He works as a local delivery driver for an international shipping company and makes just under $40,000 a year.
Two months ago, John was arrested by his local police department following an investigation of a hit and run that occurred at a convenience store near his apartment. He was charged with fleeing the scene of an accident causing substantial property damage, a Class 4 felony.
John is up for trial and is pleading “Not Guilty” to the charge. He faces up to 6 months in jail and a $1,000 fine, as well as all the other potential challenges this could bring to his career and social life.

week 3

Write an essay (1,000-1,250 words) that presents both sides of the argument for and against mandatory sentencing laws.
Your essay should analyze the discretion in sentencing federal judges had prior to the 1984 Sentencing Reform Act, which was transferred to the District Attorney’s office after passage of the Act.”
Your essay should reflect your opinion regarding this process:

1. Do you feel this transfer of power is an improvement from the previous system? Why or why not?
2. Provide a critique of deterrence and incapacitation in regards to mandatory sentencing. Are these valid goals? Explain.

Use the GCU eLibrary to locate three to four scholarly authoritative sources to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.



Week4

Write an essay of 750 to 1,000 words.

1.       Explain in general terms the concept of voir dire. What is this process in the United States and how is it accomplished.

2.       Describe what ‘challenge for cause’ means. Describe the type of circumstances where a lawyer may want to make a challenge for cause.

3.       Describe what a ‘peremptory challenge’ means. Describe the type of circumstances where a lawyer may want to make a peremptory challenge.

4.       From a strategic perspective, which is more valuable to an attorney, a peremptory challenge or a challenge for cause? Explain.

Utilize the GCU Library to locate three to five peer reviewed sources to support the essay.

Prepare this assignment according to APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion

week 5

Details:

Write an essay (1,250-1,500 words) that presents arguments for and against the abolishment of the death penalty. In your essay, be sure to do the following:

1. Include statistics regarding the use of the death penalty as a deterrent. Explain how the death penalty has impacted law enforcement.
2. Explain if there is or is not empirically verified support for the use of the death penalty as a deterrent to crime.

Use the GCU eLibrary to locate four to five scholarly, authoritative sources to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

week 6



Details:

Write an essay (1,000-1,250 words) that discusses the possibility of eliminating the juvenile justice system. Your essay should clearly state your position on the following items:

1. How has the juvenile justice system impacted law enforcement?
2. Explain if there are benefits and/or negatives to transitioning away from the traditional juvenile justice system into simply having youth divisions of regular criminal courts.
3. Compare and contrast the juvenile system to the criminal court system. Explain if eliminating the juvenile justice system is prudent or not. Support your conclusions.
4. Use two to three of the research articles you located for the research assignment in Module 1 to support your claims.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.'




week 7

Details:

Write an essay (500-750 words) that describes both sides of the debate on the costs versus the benefits of continuing the War on Drugs.
Consider the following in your essay:

1. How can legalizing drugs reduce crime? Could legalizing drugs actually increase crime? Explain and support your answers.
2. Research the Posse Comitatus Act. How is the use of military force in drug enforcement activities impacted by the Act?
3. Explain if long prison terms for drug offenders can lead to increased criminal behavior or not. Support your conclusions.

Use the GCU eLibrary to locate two to three authoritative, scholarly articles to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

week 8

etails:

Write an essay (750-1,000 words) that describes possible pros and cons of the Patriot Act. Your essay should present the viewpoints held by those in support and in opposition of this legislation. Be sure to do the following in your essay:

1. Explain whether the following statement is valid: “The Patriot Act has restricted the rights of individual Americans.” Provide sources to support your claims.
2. Explain if security has increased since the enactment of the Patriot Act and if so, has that increased security been worth the cost? Provide examples to support your claims.
3. Discuss the economic and constitutional costs impacted by this Act.

Use the GCU eLibrary to locate two to three authoritative, scholarly articles to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

As a graduate student at GCU, it is vitally important for you to know how to conduct research using the GCU eLibrary. Before you begin the assignment, be sure to access and read JUS 505: Library Resource.

Access the GCU eLibrary and locate five peer-reviewed articles on the effectiveness and usefulness of the juvenile justice system.

Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style, referring to the indicative annotation protocol.

Submit the assignment to the instructor for feedback on the quality of the sources selected. Use this feedback to revise your search for articles to use in the essay assignment in Module 6.