NR505 Analysis and Application of
Clinical Practice
Click Link Below To Buy:
Contact Us:
Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring
Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to
provide an opportunity for students to apply and disseminate information based
on practice summaries. The most common type of practice summary in healthcare
is the clinical practice guideline (CPG).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student
will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination
the research findings from nursing and related disciplines (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 9);
and
(CO 6) Utilize the principles of
evidence-based practice to propose strategies that can address nursing issues
(POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9).
Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points Possible:200 Points
Requirements:
Through this assignment, the student
will
Develop summary of a clinical
practice guideline. (COs 3, 6)
Preparing the paper
You will develop a summary that you
could use within an evidence-basedpractice (EBP) committee or related venue to
share with your colleagues. This paper will be 2-4 pages in length.
·
Select a clinical practice
guidelines that addresses an issue pertinent to your practice setting.
·
Search the literature and
evidence-based practice websites and databases to find a recent clinical
practice guideline (no more than 5 years) related to the issue you select. The
course Webliography provides websites where you can find clinical practice guidelines,
but there are many others available in specialty-organization websites.
·
Analyze and critique the clinical
practice guideline. Use the Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Template in
Course Resources to develop your paper. Components include:
o scope and purpose of the clinical
practice guidelines;
o stakeholder involvement;
o rigor of development;
o clarity and presentation
o applicability
o editorial independence
·
Attach URL
address of the Clinical Practice Guidelines on the reference page of your paper.
·
·
Note:
Thetemplate isan outline to assist you in setting up your paper so you will be
sure to address those topics in your paper in addition to other information to
meet the criteria for this assignment. Your paper should be in APA 6th ed
format. Do not copy and paste the template into your paper.
The summary sheetis amended from the
AGREE instrument on page 200 of Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2015). Your
summaryshould be approximately 5–6 pages long (Paper lengths do not
include cover page or reference page(s).
Category
|
Points
|
%
|
Description
|
Scope and Purpose
|
25
|
12.5
|
Describes the scope and purpose of
the document. Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline
|
Stakeholder Involvement
|
25
|
12.5
|
Describes the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document. Identifies the target
population.
|
Rigor of Development
|
25
|
12.5
|
Critiques the rigor of the
development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop
the guideline. Include level of evidence of the studies used to develop the
guideline.
|
Clarity & presentation
(Recommendations)
|
25
|
12.5
|
Provides thekey recommendations of
the document. Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue
in the guideline.
|
Application
|
25
|
12.5
|
Identifies facilitators, barriers,
costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document.. Identifies
key monitoring and/or auditing criteria (outcomes)
|
Editorial Independence
|
25
|
12.5
|
Discusses conflict of interest and
how competing interests of the CPG group members recorded and addressed.
|
Summary
|
25
|
12.5
|
Summarizes how the CPG answers the
key clinical questions presented in the CPG. Discusses how the student, as
the advanced practice nurse, would apply the CPG in practice.
|
Uses appropriate grammar, syntax,
and spelling
|
10
|
5
|
No more than 2 errors in grammar,
syntax, or spelling.
|
APA 6th Edition
|
10
|
5
|
No more than 2 APA 6thedition errors.
|
Attach pdf file of the Clinical
Practice Guidelines
|
5
|
2.5
|
A pdf copy of the Clinical
Practice Guidelines submitted.
|
Total
|
200
|
100%
|
A quality assignment will meet or
exceed all of the above requirements.
|
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria
|
Exceptional
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of
performance
|
Exceeds
(88%)
Very good or high level of
performance
|
Meets
(80%)
Competent or satisfactory level of
performance
|
Needs Improvement
(38%)
Poor or failing level of
performance
|
Developing
(0)
Unsatisfactory level of
performance
|
ContentPossible Points = 175
Points
|
|||||
Scope and Purpose
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Describes the scope and purpose of
the document. Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline
|
Describes the scope and purpose of
the document but has occasional missing information.
|
Describes the scope and purpose of
the document with a minimal amount of information presented.
|
Weakly describes the scope and
purpose of the document.
|
Does not include the scope or
purpose of the health question covered by the guideline.
|
|
Stakeholder Involvement
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Describes all of the stakeholders
involvement in the development of the document. Identifies the target
population
|
Describes the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document with occasional information
missing.
|
Describes the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document with a minimal amount of
information presented.
|
Does not describe the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document OR does not identify the
target population.
|
Does not describe the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document AND does not identify the
target population.
|
|
Rigor of Development
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Critiques the rigor of the
development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop
the guideline. Includes level of evidence of the studies used to develop the
guidelines. Elaborates on rigor of development.
|
Critiques the rigor of the
development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop
the guideline. Includes the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop
the guidelines. Some occasional important information is missing.
|
Critiques the rigor of the
development of the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop
the guideline. Includes the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop
the guidelines. Provides a minimal amount of information.
|
Does not critique the rigor of the
development of the document. Does not describe the systematic methods used to
develop the guideline. ORDoes not include the levels of evidence of the
studies used to develop the guidelines.
|
Does not critique the rigor of the
development of the document. Does not describe the systematic methods used to
develop the guideline. ANDDoes not include the levels of evidence of the
studies used to develop the guidelines.
|
|
Clarity & Presentation
(Recommendations)
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Provides theall key
recommendations of the document. Discusses different options for managing the
condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Elaborates on the clarity and
presentation of the recommendations.
|
Provides thekey recommendations of
the document.
Discusses different options for
managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Missing some
occasional important information.
|
Provides thekey recommendations of
the document.
Discusses different options for
managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline. Briefly
elaborates on the clarity and presentation of the recommendations.
|
Does not provide or provide thekey
recommendations of the document. ORDoes not discuss different options for
managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline.
|
Does not provide or provide thekey
recommendations of the document. ANDDoes not discuss different options for
managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline.
|
|
Application
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Identifies facilitators, barriers
(real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the
document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes).
|
Identifies facilitators, barriers
(real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the
document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes). Some
occasional important information is missing.
|
Briefly Identifies facilitators,
barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application
of the document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes).
|
Does not Identify facilitators,
barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application
of the document. ORDoes not identify key monitoring or auditing criteria
(outcomes).
|
Does not Identifies facilitators,
barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application
of the document. ANDDoes not identify key monitoring or auditing criteria
(outcomes).
|
|
Editorial Independence
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Discusses conflict of interest of
group members. Discusses how competing interests of the CPG group members are
recorded and addressed. Addresses how the views of the funding body are kept
from influencing the content of the guideline.
|
Discusses conflict of interest of
group members. Discusses how competing interests of the CPG group members are
recorded and addressed. Addresses how the views of the funding body are kept
from influencing the content of the guideline. Some occasional important
information is missing.
|
Briefly discusses conflict of
interest of group members. Briefly discusses how competing interests of the
CPG group members are recorded and addressed. Briefly addresses how the views
of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.
|
Does not discuss conflict of
interest of group members. Does not discuss how competing interests of the
CPG group members are recorded and addressed. ORDoes not address how the
views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the
guideline.
|
Does not discuss conflict of
interest of group members. Does not discuss how competing interests of the
CPG group members are recorded and addressed. AND
Does not address how the views of
the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.
|
|
Summary
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Summarizes the paper. Discusses
whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the
CPG and elaborates. Discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse,
will apply the CPG in practice with specific examples.
|
Summarizes the paper. Discusses
whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the
CPG. Discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the
CPG in practice. Some occasional important information is missing.
|
Briefly summarizes the paper.
Briefly discusses whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s)
presented in the CPG. Briefly discusses how the student, as the advance
practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice.
|
Does not summarize the paper. Does
not discuss whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s)
presented in the CPG. ORDoes not discuss how the student, as the advance
practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice.
|
Does not summarize the paper. Does
not discuss whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s)
presented in the CPG.ANDDoes not discuss how the student, as the advance
practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice.
|
|
Content Subtotal____/175 points
|
|||||
FormatPossible Points = 25 Points
|
|||||
Uses appropriate grammar, syntax,
and spelling
|
10Points
|
9 Points
|
8 Points
|
4 Points
|
0 Points
|
No errors in grammar, syntax, or
spelling
|
1-2 errors in grammar, syntax, or
spelling
|
3-4 errors in grammar, syntax, or
spelling
|
5 or more errors in grammar,
syntax, or spelling
|
6 or more errors in grammar,
syntax, or spelling
|
|
APA 6th edition
|
10Points
|
9 Points
|
8 Points
|
4 Points
|
0 Points
|
No APA 6thedition errors
|
1-2 APA 6thedition errors
|
3-4 APA 6thedition errors
|
5 APA 6thedition errors
|
6 or more APA 6thedition errorsORTurnitin similarity percentage on
student written work is higher than 24%.
|
|
Attach pdf copy of the Clinical
Practice Guideline
|
5 Points
|
0 Points
|
|||
Pdf file of the Clinical Practice
Guideline attached
|
No pdf file of the Clinical
Practice Guideline attached
|
||||
Format Subtotal____/25 points
|
|||||
Total
Points_____/200 points
|
No comments:
Post a Comment