NUR504
Week 7 Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Develop Latest
Click Link
Below To Buy:
This is a CLC assignment.
Follow the instructions provided "CLC Assignment:
Evidence-Based Project (EBP)."
Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence, and EBA Project
Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents at the
completion of the CLC assignment.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment,
solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should
be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA
Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using
the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the
rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment
criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment
NUR-504: Table of Evidence
Study
1
|
Study
2
|
Study
3
|
Study
4
|
Study
5
|
|
Author
|
|||||
Study
title
|
|||||
Research
Questions
|
|||||
Design
|
|||||
Setting/Sample
|
|||||
Methods:
intervention/instruments
|
|||||
Analysis
|
|||||
Key
findings
|
|||||
Recommendations
|
|||||
How
this supports EBP/Capstone
|
EBP Project Evaluation
Citation
|
Purpose
|
Design
|
Subject/Setting
|
Findings/Results
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
|
Implication for Practice
|
Methods
|
Data Analysis
Stats
|
Level & Quality of Evidence
(Strength & Confidence to Act)
|
Synthesis Table Example
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
|
Levels of Evidence
|
||||
Study Design
|
||||
Variable to be studied
|
||||
Variable
to be studied
|
||||
Variable
to be studied
|
Compare template above to my table
below. At a glance you can see the names of the most important articles I
choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the design was, and what
variables were important to know about in each article. As you study the table,
the reader can clearly see more studies in support of BiPAP than IS along with
other information that would be of interest to the provider to support
standards of care.
Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV
Evidence /Types of Surgery
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EBP Synthesis Table 2
Guimaraes
M.
2008
|
Gosseling,
R.
2000
|
Joris,
J.
1997
|
Ebeo,
C.
2002
|
Westwood
K.
2007
|
Leech,
C
2007
|
Freitas,
E.
2007
|
Overend,
R.
2001
|
Sungur,
M.
2007
|
Bourne,
R.
2007
|
El
Solh
2006
|
National
Guideline Clearing House
2004
|
|
Levels
of Evidence
|
I
|
II
|
II
|
II
|
III
|
VII
|
I
|
I
|
VII
|
IV
|
III
|
I
|
Design
|
Systematic
Review
|
RTC
|
RCT
|
RCT
|
Observational
Study-Non Randomized
|
Case
Report
|
RTC
|
Systematic
Review
|
Expert
Comment
|
Retrospective
Quantitative
|
Prospective
Control Trial
|
NGC/AHRQ
Guideline
|
Evidence does
not support
IS in prevention of PPCs
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
||||||||
Evidence
supporting use of IS to prevent PPCs
|
X
|
|||||||||||
Evidence
Supporting Use of NIPPV to Prevent PPCs
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|||||
NIPPV/BiPAP
Treatment 12/4
12-24hrs
Post-op
2
out of 3 hrs
|
X
|
X
|
Intraoperative
& 3hrs post-op
|
48
hrs post extubation 5 on out of 6 hrs
BiPAP
S/T-D
|
||||||||
Obese
Related Surgery
|
X
|
X
|
X
Hip
|
X
|
X
|
X
Obese patients
|
X
(OSA & surgery)
|
|||||
Abdominal
Surgery
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|||||||
Thoracic
Area/Cardiac
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
QRTC= quasi-experimental
-nonrandomized controlled trials CD=cross-over design CS=case series PCS=
prospective cohort study RCS=retrospective case series MA=meta-analysis
NIPPV=Noninvasive positive pressure
ventilation BiPAP=Bi-level positive airway pressure hrs=hours
No comments:
Post a Comment