Devry NR505
Full course
Click Link Below To Buy:
Contact Us:
Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com
Writea quantitative research question using the PICO(T) model
about a health or safety issue observed in the Ironridge or Summerville
community or your practice setting.Conducta search
of the literature for the quantitative research question. (Remember you can use this topic and quantitative research
article as part of your Research Summary Table assignment).Provide a brief summary of your quantitative research
article.
You will not be able to see other’s
posts for this forum until you have posted your response to the threaded
discussion thread.
Review the differences in predictive
and prescriptive studies and select a predictive or prescriptive article that
you found in your literature search
What are the independent variables
(IV), dependent variables (DV), and mediating variables (MVs) that you find in
the article? How do determining IVs, DVs, and MVs help you discern the theory
tested in the research? In your particular article, what risk factors are
identified, or what recommendations are provided?
devry NR505 week 3 discussion
Plan a Qualitative Study (graded)
Writea qualitative research question using the PICO(T) model
using the P (population), I (abstract concept), O (outcome), and T (time) from
the PICO(T) model about an issue from your practice setting. Conducta search of the literature for a qualitative
research article that would answer your qualitative research question. What qualitative research design (Phenomenology, Grounded
Theory, Ethnography) did you select and why? Provide a summary of the study. How will you make sure that the information you obtain is
trustworthy? How is trustworthiness in qualitative research similar and
different from reliability and validity?
devry NR505 week 4 discussion
What are the various types of
sampling, along with their advantages and disadvantages? As we think about
sampling and ethical practices, review these two documents on ethical issues in
research:
- Tuskegee syphilis study at.cdc.gov/tuskegee/">http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/
- An overview of questionable studies: Resnik, D. (2012). Research
ethics timeline (1932-present). Retrieved from.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm">http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm
What are the implications of this
information with respect to the recruitment of human subjects in a study related
to your chosen issue?
devry NR505 week 5 discussion
Inferential Statistics (graded)
Complete a PICO(T) search on a topic
that pertains to your practice setting. Select one of the articles from your search. Identify the descriptive statistics. Then describe the inferential tests that were used in the
article (in other words, t-tests and chi-squares). Given the p-values related to the tests, how do you
interpret the results? Are they statistically significant, also clinically
significant? What are the recommendations based on this paper? Share some
alternate explanations (mediating or intervening variables) for the results of
the study. If your chosen study does not
contain inferential tests, then choose a different article that does contain
inferential tests so you can participate in the discussion.
devry NR505 week 6 discussion
Evidence-Based Models (graded)Read
the box above about Mr. Lowell and his facility. As an advanced practice nurse, you will looking at various
evidence based practice models and choosing two of them to compare and contrast
here. After you compare and contrast them, discuss which one you
would recommend to this facility and why? Remember to support your posts with
scholarly research in APA 6th ed format.
devry NR505 week 7 discussion
Quality, Safety, and Costs (graded)
Class, this week I would like for
you to think about a patient scenario related to our Summerville scenario. Mr. Lowell is especially concerned
about a costly high infection rate in surgical patients at St. Louis Medical Center, along with a lack of concern about
patient's psychological needs. He has read about the efforts of
the QSEN Institute (.org/">http://qsen.org) to promote quality and safety. He was surprised to see that patient concerns are inherent
in the quality improvement conversation. Place yourself in the role of nurse educator to help the
new staff education director and the clinical practice council study both
problems. How would you explain the
relationships among quality, safety, and costs to the director and staff? How
would you demonstrate the importance of nursing care in addressing this issue?
What outcome variables would you recommend?
devry NR505 week 8 discussion
What specific skills and knowledge
that you gained through this course will be most important as you plan and
implement your practicum project? Describe a concrete way in which you
anticipate using these skills and knowledge.
Devry NR505 week 3 Research Summary
Table
Research Summary Table
Guidelineswith Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is
for the student to learn to assimilate, analyze, critique, and summarize
original research articles. In other words, select a report of
a single, original study.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student
will demonstrate the ability to:
(CO 2) Formulate and analyze nursing/clinical
problems related to nursing and other disciplines. (PO 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination
the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)
Total Points Possible: 165 Points
Requirements
Through this assignment, the student
will
1. Conduct a systematic search of relevant databases to find
research-based evidence related to a nursing problem (CO 2);
2. Construct a summary table of four peer-reviewedquantitative
single original studies, indicating the purpose, sample, design/level
of evidence, findings, and limitations of each (CO 3); and
Preparing the Table
Conduct a PICO(T) search on the
nursing problem related to your practice setting.Select the four most recent peer-reviewed studiesthat
describe original research in a single study (do not select a meta-analysis,
systematic review of research, or integrative literature review). Refer to the Types of Articles Found in the Nursing and
Healthcaredocument in the Course Resource section to make sure that you are
using the correct document.
Construct a table summarizing the
four most credible and recent studies, using the Research Summary template on
the next page (also found in Course Resource Section). Analyze each article and provide the following information
in brief format: purpose of the study; type of sample and number of
participants; design of the study, along with the level of evidence; findings
of the study; and limitations of the study.
Preparing the Summary
Briefly (2-4 pages; not including
cover page and reference page(s)) summarize the results of the four studies
as a whole. Follow this outline:
I. In a short paragraph, restate your research question and
describe your search strategy. (10 points)
II. Analysis of the designs used in the studies presented in
your research summary table. (10 points)
III. Where do these studies fall on the LevelsofEvidence table?
What is the significance of this information?(10 points)
IV. Based on these studies, what are the findings? What is the
answer to the research question?How well do the studies answer or fail to
answer the question? Provide rationale to support your answer.(10 points)
V. Howwas eachsample selected and how many participants in the
studies. Is this number adequate? Why or why not? (10 points)
VI. Overall, what are the limitations of the study, and how can
these limitations be overcome in subsequent studies? (10 points)
VII. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on
your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice or an idea for
practice? Why or why not?Please provide a rationale for your answer.(10 points)
Provide your references, formatted
in APA style, after the summary. Include the doi number for each
article. Submit a permalink of each article you have chosen for this
assignment (directions on how to obtain a permalink are located in the Course
Resource section).
Look at the example document for
this assignment. Start your paper as you would other
APA 6thedition format professional papers. Copy and paste the table into your APA paper. This should allow your paper to remain in a vertical format. Your paper should be one document.
Research Summary Table (template
provided in separate document)
Devry NR505 week 5 Critique of
Systematic Research Review
Critique of Systematic Research
Review (SRR)
Guidelineswith Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to
provide students with practice in identifying, reading, and critiquing systematic
research reviews related to nursing. A systematic review is defined as “A summary of evidence,
typically conducted by an expert or expert panel on a particular topic, that
uses a rigorous process (to minimize bias) for identifying, appraising, and
synthesizing studies to answer a specific clinical question and draw
conclusions about the data gathered (Melnyk&Fineout-Overholt,2011, p.582).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student
will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination
the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)
(CO 4) Compare and critique
quantitative and qualitative designs and methodologies for research studies. (PO 4, 7, 9, 11)
Total Points Possible:175 Points
Requirements:
1. Choose an SRR that pertains to your practice setting.Describe the relevance of the nursingresearch problem
addressed in a SRR to practice. (CO 3, 6)
2. Critique the levels of evidence of the studies used in the
SRR, specifically the designs of the studies included. (CO 6)
5. Critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for
your current practice andfuture research. (CO 3, 6)
Preparing the paper
Consult your faculty member if you
are uncertain about whether your article is a true SRR. If it is not, your grade will be affected because you will
not be able to address all of the above objectives.
Important: Submit a copy of the
systematic research review that you are critiquing as a separate document
before submitting your paper.This will help Turnitin from returning a high similarity
percentage on your written work. Remember to keep Turnitin similarity to 24% or less or you
will be deducted points on APA.
References
Melnyk, B.M., &Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011).Evidence-based
practice in nursing &healthcare(2nded.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters
Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams,& Wilkins.
Turnitin®
This assignment will be submitted to
Turnitin.You learned about Turnitin in your
NR500 course, so you should be familiar with how to access it. Additionally, you will find an instructional announcement
about Turnitin® in the course and in the Student Handbook.
Category
|
Points
|
%
|
Description
|
25
|
Fully describes the relevance of
the research problem
|
||
25
|
Fully critiques the rigor of the
studies used in the SRR
|
||
25
|
Fully critiques the levels of
evidence of the studies included in the SRR
|
||
25
|
Fully describes the clarity with
which the studies are presented and critiqued
|
||
25
|
Fully describes the overall
findings of the studies summarized in the SRR
|
||
Critiques the conclusions of the
SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research
|
25
|
Critiques the conclusions of the
SRR, with implications for current practice andfuture research
|
|
10
|
|||
APA formatting
|
10
|
APA formatting is correct
|
|
5
|
Submits a copy of the permalink of
the systematic research article that you are critiquing
|
||
175
|
100%
|
Devry NR505 Analysis and Application
of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring
Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to
provide an opportunity for students to apply and disseminate information based
on practice summaries. The most common type of practice
summary in healthcare is the clinical practice guideline (CPG).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student
will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination
the research findings from nursing and related disciplines (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 9);
and
(CO 6) Utilize the principles of
evidence-based practice to propose strategies that can address nursing issues
(POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9).
Total Points Possible:200 Points
Requirements:
Through this assignment, the student
will
Preparing the paper
You will develop a summary that you
could use within an evidence-basedpractice (EBP) committee or related venue to
share with your colleagues. This paper will be 2-4 pages in
length.
· Search the literature and
evidence-based practice websites and databases to find a recent clinical
practice guideline (no more than 5 years) related to the issue you select. The course Webliography provides websites where you can
find clinical practice guidelines, but there are many others available in
specialty-organization websites.
· Analyze and critique the clinical
practice guideline. Use the Clinical Practice Guideline
Summary Template in Course Resources to develop your paper. Components include:
o scope and purpose of the clinical
practice guidelines;
o stakeholder involvement;
o rigor of development;
o clarity and presentation
o applicability
o editorial independence
·
· Note: Thetemplate isan outline
to assist you in setting up your paper so you will be sure to address those
topics in your paper in addition to other information to meet the criteria for this
assignment. Your
paper should be in APA 6th ed format. Do not copy and paste the template into your paper.
The summary sheetis amended from the
AGREE instrument on page 200 of Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2015). Your summaryshould be approximately 5–6 pages long
(Paper lengths do not include cover page or reference page(s).
Category
|
Points
|
%
|
Description
|
Scope and Purpose
|
25
|
Describes the scope and purpose of
the document.
Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline
|
|
Stakeholder Involvement
|
25
|
||
Rigor of Development
|
25
|
||
Clarity & presentation (Recommendations)
|
25
|
||
Application
|
25
|
||
Editorial Independence
|
25
|
Discusses conflict of interest and
how competing interests of the CPG group members recorded and addressed.
|
|
Summary
|
25
|
||
Uses appropriate grammar, syntax,
and spelling
|
10
|
5
|
|
APA 6th Edition
|
10
|
5
|
|
Attach pdf file of the Clinical
Practice Guidelines
|
5
|
||
Total
|
200
|
100%
|
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria
|
Exceptional
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of
performance
|
Exceeds
(88%)
Very good or high level of
performance
|
Meets
(80%)
Competent or satisfactory level of
performance
|
Needs Improvement
(38%)
Poor or failing level of
performance
|
Developing
(0)
Unsatisfactory level of
performance
|
ContentPossible Points = 175
Points
|
|||||
Scope and Purpose
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Describes the scope and purpose of
the document.
Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline
|
|||||
Stakeholder Involvement
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Describes all of the stakeholders
involvement in the development of the document. Identifies the target population
|
Describes the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document with occasional information
missing.
|
Describes the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document with a minimal amount of
information presented.
|
Does not describe the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document OR does not identify the
target population.
|
Does not describe the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document AND does not identify the
target population.
|
|
Rigor of Development
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Clarity & Presentation
(Recommendations)
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Application
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Editorial Independence
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Does not discuss conflict of
interest of group members. Does
not discuss how competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and
addressed. AND
Does not address how the views of
the funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.
|
|||||
Summary
|
25 Points
|
22 Points
|
20Points
|
10 Points
|
0 Points
|
Content Subtotal____/175 points
|
|||||
FormatPossible Points = 25 Points
|
|||||
Uses appropriate grammar, syntax,
and spelling
|
10Points
|
9 Points
|
8 Points
|
4 Points
|
0 Points
|
No errors in grammar, syntax, or
spelling
|
1-2 errors in grammar, syntax, or
spelling
|
3-4 errors in grammar, syntax, or
spelling
|
5 or more errors in grammar,
syntax, or spelling
|
6 or more errors in grammar,
syntax, or spelling
|
|
APA 6th edition
|
10Points
|
9 Points
|
8 Points
|
4 Points
|
0 Points
|
No APA 6thedition
errors
|
1-2 APA 6thedition
errors
|
3-4 APA 6thedition
errors
|
5 APA 6thedition errors
|
6 or more APA 6thedition
errorsORTurnitin similarity percentage on student written work is higher than
24%.
|
|
Attach pdf copy of the Clinical
Practice Guideline
|
5 Points
|
0 Points
|
|||
Pdf file of the Clinical Practice
Guideline attached
|
No pdf file of the Clinical
Practice Guideline attached
|
||||
Format Subtotal____/25 points
|
|||||
Total Points_____/200 points
|
No comments:
Post a Comment