|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
|
4
Good
89.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
80.0 %Content
|
|
|
30.0 %Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue
|
Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and
resolution is not addressed.
|
Clinical problem/issue is identified with little
discussion of resolution or patient outcome.
|
Clinical problem/issue is identified
but not supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified
problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal
improvement.
|
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on clinical
observation experience or evidence in literature.
Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The
identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be
improved using nursing interventions.
|
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on key
concepts that define evidence-based practice or
clinical experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in
nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a
patient outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention.
|
|
|
30.0 %Clinical Problem/Issue, Including Description,
Evidence-Based Solution, Nursing Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care
Agency, and Nursing Practice
|
Clinical problem/issue is not described with clarity
and the corresponding elements are not included.
|
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic
understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the following
elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient
care, health care agency, and nursing practice.
|
Clinical problem/issue
description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue, the
setting, and the patient population. The following elements are explained:
evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care
agency, and nursing practice. Minimal rationale
is provided to support the resolution of the clinical problem/issue.
|
Clinical problem/issue description includes a thorough
understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population,
and why it is a problem/issue. The following
elements are explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing
intervention, and patient care consistent with specific health care agency
and nursing practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical
problem/issue resolution.
|
Clinical problem/issue description includes a developed
and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient
population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue. The identified
clinical problem/issue explains the following elements with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing
intervention, and improved patient care consistent with specific health
care agency resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is
provided in the discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution.
|
|
|
10.0 %PICOT Statement Focused on Resolution,
Improvement, Application, and Intervention
|
PICOT statement does not focus on resolution of a
problem/issue, improvement of patient care or application of a nursing
intervention.
|
PICOT statement discusses a
clinical problem/issue without a focus on improvement or intervention.
|
PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of a clinical
problem/issue that improves patient care through the application of a
nursing intervention.
|
PICOT statement focuses on
the resolution of a clinical problem/issue, with discussion of improving
patient care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing
intervention.
|
PICOT statement clearly focuses on the resolution of a
clinical problem/issue and aims at improving
patient care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing
intervention.
|
|
|
10.0 %PICOT Statement Including Population,
Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time
|
Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and
Time are not included.
|
Population, Intervention,
Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are present, but lack detail or are
incomplete.
|
Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and
Time are present.
|
Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and
Time are clearly provided and well developed.
|
Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and
Time are comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
|
|
|
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
5.0 %Presentation
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or
organizing claim.
|
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is
not clear.
|
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the
paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
|
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the
conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim
made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument
lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources
have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have
a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of
claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a
smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources
are authoritative.
|
Clear and convincing argument that presents a
persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence
construction is used.
|
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice
(register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they
are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a
few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures
of speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
5.0 %Format
|
|
|
2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation
format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
|
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors
in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
5.0 %Format
|
|
|
3.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect,
as appropriate to assignment and style, with
numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and
correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
free of error.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment