Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution and Advantages
Click Link Below To Buy:
Contact
Us:
Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com
Peer reviews should provide feedback
to a peer on the criteria
expected in the paper. Follow these instructions:
• Receive a classmate’s paper from your professor (in class if on-ground; by e-mail
if online).
• Copy the Peer Review Feedback Form from the Appendix.
• Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form.
• Provide completed Peer Review
Feedback Form and classmate’s paper to your professor.
Note: On-ground students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor during the class meeting in which the paper is reviewed; online students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor via the Assignment Tab in the course shell.
Criteria
|
+ Strengths
|
Comments < Areas for Improvement
|
Part 1
|
||
1. Revise, using feedback from the
professor and classmates, your Persuasive
Paper Part I - A Problem Exists.
|
|
The problem has been emphasized but there is lack of transition which
is needed to smoothly take the reader from the starting point of the essay
into the realm of the problem. And this is due to the undue prolonging of the
introductory paragraph. The introduction along with the problem statement
must be brief and concise in this regard.
|
Part 2
|
||
2. Included a defensible, relevant thesis statement
clearly in the first
paragraph.
|
|
A strong thesis statement is missing in the first paragraph and for
the readers it is difficult to identify one in the first paragraph also
because too much stress has been given on both the problem and solution. A
concrete and concise thesis statement must be incorporated within the first
paragraph.
|
3. Explain a detailed, viable
solution that supports your
thesis. This should be
one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Viable solutions have been detailed in paragraphs succeeding the
introductory paragraph and proper evidences to justify the viability have
also been provided.
|
|
4. State, explain, and support the first advantage
(economic, social, political, environmental, social,
equitable, ethical/moral, etc.)
to your solution. This should
be one or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
|
|
Thorough changes have to be made as there is no indication of the
existence of separate arenas of advantages. The discussion has been too
generic and the writer needs to incorporate valid information to exemplify
the advantages in respect of aspects like society, economy, ethics, politics,
etc.
|
5. State, explain, and support the second
advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social,
equitable, ethical/moral, etc.)
to your solution. This should
be one or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
|
|
Thorough changes have to be made as there is no indication of the
existence of separate arenas of advantages. The discussion has been too
generic and the writer needs to incorporate valid information to exemplify
the advantages in respect of aspects like society, economy, ethics, politics,
etc.
|
6. State, explain, and support the third (and
fourth if desired) advantage (economic, social, political, environment,
social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one
or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
|
Some hints on ethical theories have been given but it is not at all
sufficient and the discussion has to be restructured and stark separation of
aspects must be infused to make the readers understand whether the advantages
are of social, political, economic, ethical, or environmental in nature.
|
7. Use effective
transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
|
|
The entire paper is
lacking effective transitional words and the writer has to emphasize on the
need of such usage and the writer has to incorporate such transitional words
to ensure a coherent structure and a logical flow.
|
8. Provide
a concluding
paragraph
/transitional paragraph that
summarizes the proposed solution
and its advantages.
|
|
The writer has failed to restate the issue and the problem (as there
is no mentioning of mobile phone’s detrimental uses) in the concluding
paragraph and that is the reason why the conclusion seems ineffective.
|
9. Develop a coherently
structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
|
|
There is lack of coherency despite the fact that the paper is divided
into several paragraphs. The introductory part should be rectified and the
thesis statement should be made clearer.
|
10. Use one or more rhetorical
strategies (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain advantages.
|
|
In the paper the writer has not infused any kind of rhetorical
strategies and that is why the paper doesn’t seems so much appealing. It has
neither appealed to the reader’s emotions or logic, and the writer has also
failed to establish his own authority and credibility.
|
11. Support advantage claims with at
least three (3) additional quality relevant references. Use at least six (6) total for Parts 1 & 2.
|
|
The referencing style seems erroneous and it has not adhered to
academic referencing formats like APA, MLA, etc.
|
12. Other
|
|
The writer needs to be more persuasive so that the problem seems a
definite problem to the readers and the readers start paying attention to the
writer’s recommended solutions. The paper lacks rhetorical strategies,
coherency, and a logical progression.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment