NR505 week 5 Critique of Systematic
Research Review
Click Link Below To Buy:
Contact Us:
Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com
Critique of Systematic Research
Review (SRR)
Guidelineswith Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to
provide students with practice in identifying, reading, and critiquing
systematic research reviews related to nursing. A systematic review
is defined as “A summary of evidence, typically conducted by an expert or
expert panel on a particular topic, that uses a rigorous process (to minimize
bias) for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing studies to answer a
specific clinical question and draw conclusions about the data gathered
(Melnyk&Fineout-Overholt,2011, p.582).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student
will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination
the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 9, 11)
(CO 4) Compare and critique
quantitative and qualitative designs and methodologies for research studies.
(PO 4, 7, 9, 11)
Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5
Total Points Possible:175 Points
Requirements:
1.
1. Choose an SRR that pertains to
your practice setting.Describe the relevance of the nursingresearch
problem addressed in a SRR to practice. (CO 3, 6)
2.
2. Critique the levels of evidence
of the studies used in the SRR, specifically the designs of the studies
included. (CO 6)
3.
3. Critique the clarity with which
the studies are presented and critiqued. (CO 6)
4.
4. Describe the overall findings of
the studies, as summarized in the SRR. (CO 3, 6)
5.
5. Critique the conclusions of the
SRR, with implications for your current practice andfuture
research. (CO 3, 6)
6.
6. Utilize the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews to locate a true SRR for this assignment.
7.
7. Paper length should be between
4-6 pages (not including cover page and reference page(s).
Preparing the paper
Consult your faculty member if you
are uncertain about whether your article is a true SRR. If it is not, your
grade will be affected because you will not be able to address all of the above
objectives.
Important: Submit a copy of the
systematic research review that you are critiquing as a separate document
before submitting your paper.This will help Turnitin from returning a high
similarity percentage on your written work. Remember to keep Turnitin
similarity to 24% or less or you will be deducted points on APA.
References
Melnyk, B.M., &Fineout-Overholt,
E. (2011).Evidence-based practice in nursing &healthcare(2nded.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott,
Williams,& Wilkins.
Turnitin®
This assignment will be submitted to
Turnitin.You learned about Turnitin in your NR500 course, so you should be
familiar with how to access it. Additionally, you will find an instructional
announcement about Turnitin® in the course and in the Student Handbook.
Category
|
Points
|
%
|
Description
|
Describes the relevance of the
research problem addressed in the SRR to practice.
|
25
|
14.28
|
Fully describes the relevance of
the research problem
|
Critiques the research rigor of
the studies used in the SRR (see lesson’s levels of evidence).
|
25
|
14.28
|
Fully critiques the rigor of the
studies used in the SRR
|
Critiques the levels of evidence,
specifically the designs of the studies included in the SRR.
|
25
|
14.28
|
Fully critiques the levels of
evidence of the studies included in the SRR
|
Critiques the clarity with which
the studies are presented and critiqued.
|
25
|
14.28
|
Fully describes the clarity with
which the studies are presented and critiqued
|
Describes the overall findings of
the studies, as summarized in the SRR.
|
25
|
14.28
|
Fully describes the overall
findings of the studies summarized in the SRR
|
Critiques the conclusions of the
SRR, with implications for your current practice and future
research
|
25
|
14.28
|
Critiques the conclusions of the
SRR, with implications for current practice andfuture research
|
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling
reflect format written work.
|
10
|
5.71
|
Grammar, spelling, word usage, and
punctuation are consistent with rules for formal written work.
|
APA formatting
|
10
|
5.71
|
APA formatting is correct
|
Submit a copy of the systematic
research article you are critiquing.
|
5
|
2.85
|
Submits a copy of the permalink of
the systematic research article that you are critiquing
|
175
|
100%
|
A quality assignment will meet or
exceed all of the above requirements.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment