|
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
|
4
Good
85.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
|
40.0 %Assessment of the Appropriateness of Statistics used in
Two Studies. Determination of the Statistical Significance of the Results
and Discussion of the Value of Statistical Significance Versus Pragmatic
Usefulness
|
Failure to demonstrate the ability to assess the
appropriateness of statistics used in a study. Failure to determine the
statistical significance of the results or discuss the value of statistical
significance versus pragmatic usefulness.
|
Demonstrates only minimal ability to assess the
appropriateness of statistics used in a study. Demonstrates only minimal
understanding of how to determine the statistical significance of the
results or discuss the value of statistical significance versus pragmatic
usefulness.
|
Demonstrates ability to assess the appropriateness of
statistics used in a study, but has some slight misunderstanding of the
implications and meaning. Provides a basic understanding of how to
determine the statistical significance of the results or discuss the value
of statistical significance versus pragmatic usefulness.
|
Demonstrates ability to assess the appropriateness of
statistics used in a study (in student's own words). Understands the
statistical significance of the results and discusses the value of
statistical significance versus pragmatic usefulness.
|
Describes clearly the ability to assess the appropriateness
of statistics used in a study (in student's own words). Clearly describes a
thorough understanding of how to determine the statistical significance of
the results and discuss the value of statistical significance versus pragmatic
usefulness.
|
|
|
30.0 %Integration of Information from Outside Resources into
the Body of Paper
|
Failure to use references, examples, or explanations.
|
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations
and no published references.
|
Supports main points with examples and explanations, but
fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.
|
Supports main points with references, explanations, and
examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of
the criteria.
|
Supports main points with references, examples, and full
explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and
describes major points of the criteria.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
7.0 %Assignment Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments
and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the
purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses
noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument
lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources
have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but
not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible.
Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from
introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence
construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure,
and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of
speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct,
although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing
and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment and style)
|
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
|
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently
used.
|
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be
present
|
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually
correct.
|
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
|
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment