SFTY330 full course -all discussions
and mod. 5.6 Assignment
Click Link Below To Buy:
Contact Us:
Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com
SFTY330 module 1.5 discussion latest 2016
may
1.5 – Discussion: NTSB Organization
1313 unread replies.7979 replies.
I. Answer the following, along with
any additional questions your Instructor may post, in this discussion forum.
·
Explain the concept that the NTSB is
“independent.” Thence, define the scope and purpose of the Party System.
II. Vague, short answers absent of
detailed qualifications will not be accepted. Support your opinions with
references. You may use course material, but be specific. Personal experiences,
etc. may be used to enhance your perspective on the question, but they must be
valid and relative to the subject matter. Your instructor will evaluate your
posts using the also accessible
under Resources.
III. Read the posts of your
classmates and reply, evaluating at least one other student’s post. Discussions
are worth 15% of your final grade.
SFTY330
module 2.6 discussion latest 2016 may
2.6 – Discussion: Pilot Error and
Crash Lab Observations
5555 unread replies.7575 replies.
I. Answer the following questions in
this discussion forum, along with any additional questions your Instructor may
post.
1. Pilot Error: Does the phrase “pilot error” really tell us
anything about accidents? Is this a cause or a blame issue? What are the
elements that define an “error” which might be important to the investigator?
2. Crash Lab Observations: What were the weather conditions
during the approach to landing and did the flight profile seem normal?
II. A substantial response shows
thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is not
acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use course material,
but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to enhance your
perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to the subject
matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the
III. Read the posts of your classmates
and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330
module 3.5 discussion latest 2016 may
3.5 – Discussion: Organizational
Culture and Crash Lab
7272 unread replies.7676 replies.
I. Answer the following questions in
this discussion forum, along with any additional questions your Instructor may
post.
1. Culture: Can management or organizational culture actually
cause a mishap? If this is true, then provide examples of “paper trails” an
investigator would need to examine that would support this alleged causation or
influence to an accident.
2. Crash Lab Observations: Was the accident site consolidated
into a localized area and were all the parts of the plane there, as best as you
can tell? It may help to include a brief introduction of your work.
II. A substantial response shows
thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is not
acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use course material,
but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to enhance your
perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to the subject
matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the
III. Read the posts of your
classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330
module 4.4 discussion latest 2016 may
4.4 – Discussion: Fire Sources
2121 unread replies.7171 replies.
I. Answer the following question,
along with any additional questions your Instructor may post.
·
Can you think of various fire
sources (other than fuel related) that may be of investigative concern? Provide
an example.
II. A substantial response shows
thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is not
acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use course material
but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to enhance perspective
to the question but they must be valid and relative to the subject matter. Your
instructor will evaluate your posts using the
III. Read the posts of your
classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330
module 5.5 discussion latest 2016 may
5.5 – Discussion: Turbines and Crash
Lab
7676 unread replies.7979 replies.
I. Answer the following questions in
this discussion forum, along with any additional questions your Instructor may
post.
1. Turbines: What is meant in the Air Detective Tip by,
“Turbines have a memory?” How does that relate to an investigation?
2. Crash Lab Observations: What was the purpose and importance
of the witness interviews and based on your readings, were these interviews
helpful?
II. A substantial response shows
thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is not
acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use course material,
but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to enhance your
perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to the subject
matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the
III. Read the posts of your
classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330
module 6.4 discussion latest 2016 may
6.4 – Discussion: Structural Failure
and Crash Lab
3030 unread replies.7979 replies.
I. Answer the following questions in
this discussion forum, along with any additional questions your Instructor may
post
1. Structural Fatigue: Structural fatigue can be associated
with pilot induced overload, but can you think of other factors that have
induced a failure in the structure of an aircraft?
2. Crash Lab Observations: Did you detect any obvious failure
modes or conditions that may have affected the flight?
II. A substantial response shows
thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is not
acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use course material,
but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to enhance your
perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to the subject
matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the
III. Read the posts of your
classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330
module 7.5 discussion latest 2016 may
7.5 – Discussion: GA Aircraft and
Crash Lab
5151 unread replies.6060 replies.
I. Answer the following questions in
this discussion forum, along with any additional questions your Instructor may
post.
1. Data Recorders: Consider that many general aviation aircraft
now have glass cockpits with no impact resistant data recorders. Should
personal use aircraft be required to have some form of flight data recorders?
2. Crash Lab Observations: What does CREEP stand for and did
you detect any obvious signatures revealing issues with survivability?
II. A substantial response shows
thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is not
acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use course material,
but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to enhance your
perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to the subject
matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the
III. Read the posts of your classmates
and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330
module 8.7 discussion latest 2016 may
8.7 – Discussion: NTSB Report on
Icing Accident and Crash Lab
2323 unread replies.5959 replies.
I. Answer the following questions in
this discussion forums, along with any additional questions your Instructor may
post.
1. Icing Accident: Opine to the major issue in the Roselawn,
IN. (NTSB AAR-9601) icing accident. Was it the unique ice, crew issue, or an
aircraft design flaw? Did the aircraft manufacturer (BEA) agree with this
report? Do you agree with the recommendations? In this case, references are not
required.
2. Crash Lab Observations: Based on what you have seen can you
establish any causation? Do you see any similarities between the accident
simulation and another accident discussed in this course?
II. A substantial response shows
thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is not
acceptable. Support your opinions with references. You may use course material,
but be specific. Personal experiences, etc. may be used to enhance your
perspective to the question but they must be valid and relative to the subject
matter. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the
III. Read the posts of your
classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330
module 9.1 discussion latest 2016 may
9.1 – Discussion: Accident
Investigation
4949 unread replies.6363 replies.
I. Answer the following question,
along with any additional questions your Instructor may post in this forum.
Accident Investigation: Explain how
aircraft accident investigation is both a reactive and yet proactive process.
II. A substantial response shows
thought and critical thinking, a short, two or three sentence response is not
acceptable. Your instructor will evaluate your posts using the
III. Read the posts of your
classmates and reply and evaluate at least one other student’s posting.
SFTY330 module 5.6 assignment
latest 2016 may
Graded
Assignment
For your first required written
project you assessed the NTSB Accident Report in terms of human factor errors
by using the HFAC model and wrote a case study that identifies several key
human factor failures and explains how each human factor in the accident may
have contributed to another failure that ultimately created an error chain.
Your paper should be a well-written APA formatted report, 4-5 pages in length,
plus a title page and abstract page and follow the guidelines provided in
Grading
Grading is based on proper APA
style, format and language and the ability to clearly illustrate the error
sequence within the accident profile. Review the information on this assignment
in the and verify your paper addresses all
of the project requirements. Your instructor will evaluate your project using
the evaluation rubric linked in the Project Room. Your project is worth 15% of
your final grade.
Important
Upon submission, your work will
automatically be evaluated through
(Links to an external site.), a
plagiarism detection tool. Your paper will be checked against a database of
millions of written works and provide feedback on originality. You may view
your originality report; however, you will not be permitted to submit your
paper a second time. Ensure your work is entirely your own and cite your
sources!
Before submitting your assignment,
save your file using the following naming convention: lastname_HFProject (e.g.,
lindbergh_HFProject.docx) and submit your document using the Submit Assignment link to the upper right.
v
No comments:
Post a Comment