jus505 all discussions Week 1 to 8

 

 

                Click Link Below To Buy:

 

 

http://hwcampus.com/shop/jus505-discussions-week-1-8/

 

 

Contact Us:

Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com

 

 

week 1


Max Points: 5.0

Research and read the Supreme Court case Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 261 (1971). Analyze why, even though the Supreme Court had ruled that plea bargaining was an essential and desirable part of the criminal justice system, the Attorney General of Alaska, Avrum Gross, ordered an end to all plea bargaining in 1975. Do you agree with the Attorney General’s decision? Explain your position.

Discuss the ethical and legal implications involved in the plea bargain offered to Paul Hayes, who was offered a 5-year sentence for a guilty plea for attempting to pass a bad check, in exchange for not going to trial under Kentucky’s three-strikes law.

week 2

Discuss the Taylor v. Louisiana Supreme Court case. How did it change the Sixth Amendment requirement of an impartial jury? Or did it? Discuss the constitutional requirement that a defendant be tried by an impartial jury of his peers. What exactly does the term impartial mean?
Are you in favor of or against having a cross-sectional representative jury pool? Why? Support your position.
week 3