JUS
505 Entire Course-GC
Click Link Below To Buy:
Contact Us:
Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com
JUS 505 Entire Course-GC
JUS505
JUS 505 Week 1 Discussion 1
Research and read the Supreme Court case Santobello v. New York,
404 U.S. 257, 261 (1971). Analyze why, even though the Supreme Court had ruled
that plea bargaining was an essential and desirable part of the criminal
justice system, the Attorney General of Alaska, Avrum Gross, ordered an end to
all plea bargaining in 1975. Do you agree with the Attorney General’s decision?
Explain your position.
JUS 505 Week 1 Discussion 2
Discuss the ethical and legal implications involved in the plea
bargain offered to Paul Hayes, who was offered a 5-year sentence for a guilty
plea for attempting to pass a bad check, in exchange for not going to trial
under Kentucky’s three-strike law.
JUS 505 Week 1 Assignment 1 Plea Bargaining Essay
JUS 505 Week 1 Assignment 2 Annotated Bibliography
Details:
Write an essay (500-750 words) on the constitutionality of the
plea bargaining process. Be sure to do the following:
Your essay should include an analysis of the Supreme Court ruling
in U.S. v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622 (2002), in which the court held that prosecutors
need not inform defendants about the disparity during negotiations involved in
the plea bargaining process. Give your reaction to this ruling.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of prosecutors and
defense attorneys being able to use plea bargaining. How do their goals differ?
Describe whether you feel these advantages and disadvantages weigh into the
constitutionality of the practice.
Use the GCU eLibrary to locate two to three authoritative,
scholarly articles to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in
the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not
required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please
refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Details:
As a graduate student at GCU, it is vitally important for you to
know how to conduct research using the GCU eLibrary. Before you begin the
assignment, be sure to access and read JUS 505: Library Resource.
Access the GCU eLibrary and locate five peer-reviewed articles on
the effectiveness and usefulness of the juvenile justice system.
Copy and paste the citations and abstracts of each article into a
Word document.
Submit the assignment to the instructor for feedback on the
quality of the sources selected. Use this feedback to revise your search for
articles to use in the essay assignment in Module 6.
JUS 505 Week 2 Discussion 1
Discuss the Taylor v. Louisiana Supreme Court case. How did it
change the Sixth Amendment requirement of an impartial jury? Or did it? Discuss
the constitutional requirement that a defendant be tried by an impartial jury
of his peers. What exactly does the term impartial mean?
JUS 505 Week 2 Discussion 2
Are you in favor of or against having a cross-sectional
representative jury pool? Why? Support your position.
JUS 505 Week 2 Assignment
Jury Selection Essay
Details:
For this assignment, you will construct a cross-sectional jury
according to jury empanelment requirements as established by such rulings as
Taylor v. Louisiana.
Use the following items to complete the assignment:
1. The John Morgan Case Study.
2. The 2010 U.S. Census data found at
http://www.census.gov/2010census/data/
3. Other demographic data found at http://fedstats.sites.usa.gov/
.
Look up the Census and other demographic data for the county in
which you live. Imagine John Morgan is being tried for his accused crime in
your county.
Construct a jury consisting of 12 jurors who will decide John
Morgan’s case. Write a brief description of each juror (a short paragraph for
each) that includes his or her name, age, race, gender, educational and income
level, and any other information you feel is important to portray each juror.
Be sure that the jury you create represents an appropriate cross-section given
John Morgan’s information and the other data you have collected.
Write an explanation (250-500 words) as to how the jury you
construct represents an appropriate cross-section of John Morgan’s peers. Use
the data in your findings and any other appropriate information to defend your
rational.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in
the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not
required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.
John Morgan Case Study
John Morgan is a single 38-year-old white male. His formal
education consists of a high school diploma and a few semesters of college, but
no college degree. He works as a local delivery driver for an international
shipping company and makes just under $40,000 a year.
Two months ago, John was arrested by his local police department
following an investigation of a hit and run that occurre
No comments:
Post a Comment