NUR504 full course [ all
discussions and all assignments ]
Click Link Below To Buy:
http://hwcampus.com/shop/nur504-full-course/
Contact Us:
Hwcoursehelp@gmail.com
DQ 1
Discuss the differences between
research, research utilization, and evidence-based practice. You may want to
link this to the historical evolution of research in nursing.
DQ
Identify and discuss two major ways
in which qualitative research differs from quantitative research. Is one better
than the other? Provide reference(s).
Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 2
Discussion DQ 1 & DQ 2 Latest 2015
DQ 1
Discuss sources of bias for both
quantitative and qualitative research. For quantitative research, be sure to
address both random and systematic bias. You may use examples from the articles
you selected as illustrations of bias and/or preventing bias.
DQ 2
Researchers often identify the
research problem and then go in search of a theory. Discuss the disadvantages
of doing this. What does the textbook recommend that researchers do to assure a
true fit between theory and designing the study?
Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 3
Discussion DQ 1 & DQ 2 Latest 2015
DQ 1
Describe the quantitative design of
the article you selected. Present the strengths and limitations of this type of
design according to the textbook and how these are reflected in your study.
Contrast the design you have selected with at least one design presented by a
classmate in one of your responses.
DQ 2
Describe the qualitative design (or
methodology) of the article you selected. Present the strengths and limitations
of this type of design according to the textbook and how these are reflected in
your study. Contrast the design you have selected with at least one design
presented by a classmate in one of your responses.
Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 4
Discussion DQ 1 & DQ 2 Latest 2015
DQ1
Read the section Questionnaires
versus Interviews on pages 305-306 in the textbook. How are these guidelines
similar and different from data collected by nurses when giving care? What
principles did you identify that are new to you but could be important in
improving your collection of clinical data?
DQ 2
You are interested in nurses'
attitudes toward EBP. Which method do you think would work best to obtain this
information: a questionnaire, a face-to-face interview, or a group interview?
Defend your answer.
Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 5
Discussion DQ 1 & DQ 2 Latest 2015
DQ 1
Demographic data is collected for
every study. What is the purpose of describing the demographic data?
DQ 2
There is a tendency for novice
researchers to develop their own instrument if they cannot readily find one.
How might you respond to a peer or manager who asks you to help develop a new
tool to collect patient data on anxiety prior to cardiac catheterization?
Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 6
Discussion DQ 1 & DQ 2 Latest 2015
DQ 1
State in your own words what is
meant by Type I and Type II errors. Why are these important? Name one thing
that can be done to improve internal validity of a study.
DQ 2
An example of a multivariate
procedure is analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Explain what is meant by the
following statement: ANCOVA offers post hoc statistical control. Provide an
example
.
Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 7
Discussion DQ 1 & DQ 2 Latest 2015
DQ 1
In the final section of study
reports, there is a section on implications and recommendations. Describe the
difference between these terms. Provide examples from one of the studies that
you critiqued.
DQ 2
Researchers have a responsibility to
identify the limitations of a study. What is meant by limitation? Provide
examples from one of the studies that you critiqued.
Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 8
Discussion DQ 1 & DQ 2 Latest 2015
DQ1
Post your group’s CLC EBP project.
Critically read two CLC EBP projects (other than your own). Name one barrier
for each that could impact the implementation of the guideline in practice and
how you would work through this issue.
DQ 2
Discuss what is meant by
mixed-methods designs. What are the limitations of these designs.
week 1
Select an article from a
peer-reviewed nursing journal rding an EBP process or implementation.
Write a summary of 750-1,000 words
that includes the following criteria:
- An introduction that explains the focus of the article.
- A summary of key points of the article.
- A list of the steps taken by nursing to develop and
implement an EBP.
- Application of the learned information to a practice
setting where the student either identifies an EBP that has been applied
to your setting or a practice problem that would benefit from the
implementation of an EBP.
- A clear and concise conclusion.
This assignment uses a grading
rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment
to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful
completion of the assignment.
Prepare this assignment according to
the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center.
You are required to submit this
assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
week 2
Choose two scholarly, peer-reviewed
articles about research studies.
The articles can be found using the
GCU Library or any of the sources recommended in the readings.
Address the following:
- One article must be an example of a qualitative
research study; the other must be a quantitative example.
- These articles will be utilized for assignments in
Modules 3, 4, 6 and 8.
- Write a 350-500-word statement which includes:
- A description of why each research study is categorized
as quantitative or qualitative.
- A justification for your selections.
- The journal page reference for the research study
selected and the reasons why it was selected.
- A link to the selected articles or an attached copy of
each article.
APA format is not required, but
solid academic writing is expected.
You are not required to submit this
assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so
directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word
documents can be submitted to Turnitin
This is a CLC Asssignment.
You will be assigned to a CLC group
by the instructor.
Within your group, follow the
instructions provided in the CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project
(EBP).
Finalize the CLC Agreement.
CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based
Project (EBP)
Group work has benefits and
liabilities. Everyone assigned to a CLC is expected to equally participate in
the work in terms of time and quality of effort. The assignment should be
apportioned to make the best use of the strengths of individual team members.
Some of you are natural leaders. Your strengths can be your greatest
liabilities. No one wants to be bossed around no matter how skilled the boss.
Honest communication is critical to effective group work. The best way to avoid
conflict is to set very clear expectations. Then, if someone does not do what
is expected, he or she can be referred to the original agreement rather than
have the confrontation become personal.
At the end of the project, students
will have an opportunity to evaluate each other. These evaluations will be
taken into consideration when grading individuals within the group. The grade
will be given for the project as compared to the rubric for evaluation.
Depending on your evaluations, individual grades will be equal to or less than
the overall grade. Course faculty are able to observe the process in
the CLC forum. If your work takes place outside the forum, this information
will be absent. Be certain, even if you communicate via e-mail, phone, or
face-to-face, to record the communication in the CLC forum.
NOTE: The final course of your
program will require you to develop and implement an EBP guideline. This is
your opportunity to learn the process and perhaps even identify an area of
interest. Your choice of a topic for the capstone course should be related to
your area of specialty. Each course you take will provide you with the
opportunity to investigate theory and empirical literature to identify the
relevant evidence you will need to complete this project. The more effort you
expend now to learn this process, the easier it will be for you to complete the
program efficiently.
Topic 1:
Collaborative Learning Community:
EBP Agreement
1) Check into your CLC group.
a) Describe your prior experience
with evidence-based practice (EBP) includingparticipation in developing EBP
guidelines or protocols for changing practice.
CLC Agreement
1) Review the CLC Agreement
a) Choose one member totransfer the
CLC Agreement to the CLC forum, input the CLC’s responses for all sections of
the Agreement, and submit the CLC Agreement.
b) Each member should provide their
contact information on the CLC Agreement and decide what tasks in the Project
Management Specifics section they will be responsible for.
c) In the CLC Forum, discuss and
provide responses for each component of the CLC Agreement. The CLC Group Review
Process will be completed at the end of your project.
d) Discuss the advantages and
disadvantages of working in a team environment.
2) Record all communication in the
CLC Forum.
3) Complete the CLC agreement,
except for the CLC Group Review Process.
4) Submit the completed CLC
Agreement to the instructor at the end of Topic 2.
Topic 2:
Collaborative Learning Community:
EBP Agreement.
Brainstorm: Initiate conversation
regarding potential topics of interest.
1) This should be a nursing related
problem, that is, a problem related to nursing practice, advance practice,
leadership, or education. .
2) Identify several topics of
interest and have individual group members do a quick survey of the literature
to be sure that there is evidence available.
3) In order to develop a
guideline/protocol, you will need credible resources. Read pages 29-34 for
guidance in identifying sources of evidence.
a) The course readings include all
of the information needed to complete this project. Chapters 1 and 2 provided
the necessary information regarding EBP and how to find evidence. Chapter 5
provides strategies for locating credible information. The sooner these
chapters are read carefully, with the project in mind, the easier it will be.
4) Record all communication in the
CLC Forum.
Topic 3:
Collaborative Learning Community:
EBP Identification of Clinical Question
1) Refer to Figure 2.2 in the
textbook for the model you will use to complete this project.
a. Note that you will not complete
the entire process in this model, you will reach the step entitled,Pilot the
change in practice.
2) As a group, finalize your choice
of topic.
a. Review the literature regarding
clinical problems presented in the previous topic in order to ensure that there
is adequate evidence for your choice.
b. State your topic in the form of a
problem statement and a foreground question.
c. The course readings include all
of the information you need to complete this project.
d. Record all communication in the
CLC Forum.
3) Choose one team member to submit
the completed assignment and initial reference list to the instructor by the
end of Topic4.
Topic 4:
Collaborative Learning Community:
EBP Literature Search/Appraisal of Evidence
1) UseFigure 2.1, Evidence hierarchy
pyramid, inthe textbook as your guide for the levels of evidence in your
reference list.
2) Locate case studies, relevant
clinical articles written by experts, research articles,, evidence based
guidelines and protocolsand theory that may guide the identification of
appropriate solutions. This can include the articles reviewed from topic 3.
Note, not all theories will have research that allows them to have a level
assigned to them. This does not mean they are not good theories.
3) Appraise the evidence using the
guidelines provided on pages 37-40 in the textbook.
a. Use these guidelines to discard
references that are untrustworthy or irrelevant.
b. Use Box 2.2 to help with this
decision-making process.
4) Use the following to organize the
evidence by commonalities and/or contrary findings:
a. Chapter 5in the textbook provides
information regarding how to synthesize the article findings.
b. Use the EBP Project Evaluation
tool located in resources to consolidate and present the findings
5) Record all communication in the
CLC Forum.
Topic 5:
Collaborative Learning Community:
EBP Literature Search/Appraisal of Evidence
1) Continue with the articles used
inTopic 4.
2) Complete the Synthesis Table for
the evidence and variables for the guideline.
a. Limit the articles to no more
than ten; two per student in the CLC group would be reasonable.
b. A true proposal would require a
comprehensive review of the literature and inclusion of all relevant works.
3) Record all communications in the
CLC Forum.
Topic 6:
Collaborative Learning Community:
EBP Develop Clinical Guideline and Implementation Plan
1) Initiate work on developing a
guideline or protocol based on your search of the literature.
2) Consider how to implement the
intervention to test the protocol.
3) Identify potential barriers and
describe strategies to gain cooperation from individuals who will be
implementing the change.
4) Record all communication in the
CLC Forum.
Topic 7:
Collaborative Learning Community:
EBP Development Guidelines and Implementation Plan
1. Complete the protocol and write
the plan to pilot the change in practice.
2. The Clinical Guidelines should
include the problem statement, EBP question, literature review, along with all
the tables used to arrive at the conclusion (can be appendices), the clinical
protocol, and the implementation plan.. There is no specific template for this
guideline/assignment.
3. The Implementation Plan for the
protocol should include a timeline with criteria for evaluating the outcomes.
4. Use APA style headings for each
section with subheadings as appropriate.
a. References should include all
documents used for literature review along with sources used to guide the
process.
- Record all communication in the CLC Forum.
6. Submit the completed assignment
to the instructor on the last day of Topic 7 and have one CLC member post the
completed assignment all together in Topic 8 discussion forum.
Address the
following:
1. Write one research
summary that uses a quantitative research design.
2. Write one research
summary that uses a qualitative research design.
3. Each summary should
be 250-500 words and should follow the template, Summarize Research Articles.
4. Use APA Level Heading
2 to separate the distinct parts of the study.
These article summaries will form the basis of the Critique
of Research Studies Parts 1-3 assignments in modules 4, 6, and 8.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be
using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the
rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment
criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin,
unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the
Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin.
NUR 504 Summarize
Research Articles
Directions: Use the templates
below when summarizing your research articles. Include a cover page, and start
a new page for each article summary. Use level 1 and 2 headings when composing
the summaries to separate distinct parts.
Title of Quantitative Article
(Example
of text: This article was authored by Watson and James and published in the
Journal of Nursing Research in 2008. This article was selected as an example of
a quasi-experimental design.The model summary selected for this paper is found
on page 90 to 91of the textbook.This is a summary of a quasi-experimental study
in which though there is a comparison group; subjects were not randomly
assigned to groups. The research article being summarized also is an experiment
that used a comparison group without randomization.)
Problem Statement
Statement of Purpose
Research Question(s)/Hypothesis
Study Methods
Key Findings
Citation
Title of Qualitative Article
(Example
of text:Ramirez (2008) studied adolescent depression and the influence of
significant adults on the course of the depression.The model summary utilized
is found on page 91of the textbook. It was selected because it is an example of
a grounded theory study as is the article selected.)
Problem Statement
Statement of Purpose
Research Question(s)
Method
Key Findings
Citation
week 4
This is a CLC assignment.
Follow the instructions provided in
"CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP)."
Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table
of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment.
Submit these documents in Topic 5 as the CLC assignment.
APA format is not required, but
solid academic writing is expected.
You are not required to submit this
assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so
directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word
documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Synthesis Table Example
Synthesis Table Example
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
|
Levels of Evidence
|
||||
Study Design
|
||||
Variable to be studied
|
||||
Variable
to be studied
|
||||
Variable
to be studied
|
Compare template
above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most
important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the
design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As
you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of
BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the
provider to support standards of care.
Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery
Follow
the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions.
Prepare
this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center.
This
assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade
the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning
the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations
for successful completion of the assignment.
You
are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise
directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success
Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Critique of Research Studies
Instructions
Directions:
Complete a critique of the
quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Module 3.
This assignment will be completed in
three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that
should be included in each part.
Follow the guidelines for the
quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages
112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook.
1) Utilize a central heading to
indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.
2) The side headings of the critique
for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3.
3) Note that within these BASIC
guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing
Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various
elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and
to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.
When turning in the final
submission, please put in the the following order: Quantitative Article
Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two
articles, the text, and any other additional sources).
Critique of Research Studies – Part
1: Due Module 4
For Part 1 of the critique, focus
only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative
|
Qualitative
|
·
Title
|
·
Title
|
·
Abstract
|
·
Abstract
|
·
Introduction
|
·
Introduction
|
o
Statement of the problem
|
o
Statement of the problem
|
o
Hypotheses or research questions
|
o
Research questions
|
o
Literature review
|
o
Literature review
|
o
Conceptual/theoretical framework
|
o
Conceptual underpinnings
|
Critique of Research
Studies – Part 2: Due Module 6
For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following
segments for each article:
Quantitative
|
Qualitative
|
·
Method
|
·
Method
|
o
Protection of human rights
|
o
Protection of participants’ rights
|
o
Research design
|
o
Research design and research tradition
|
o
Population and sample
|
o
Sample and setting
|
o
Data collection and measurement
|
o
Data collection
|
o
Procedures
|
o
Procedures
|
o
Enhancement of trustworthiness
|
Critique of Research
Studies - Part 3: Due Module 8
For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following
segments for each article:
Quantitative
|
Qualitative
|
·
Results
|
·
Results
|
o
Data analysis
|
o
Data analysis
|
o
Findings
|
o
Findings
|
·
Discussion
|
o
Theoretical integrations
|
o
Interpretation of findings
|
·
Discussion
|
o
Implications/recommendations
|
o
Interpretation of the findings
|
·
Global Issues
|
o
Implications/recommendations
|
o
Presentation
|
·
Global Issues
|
o
Researcher credibility
|
o
Presentation
|
o
Summary assessment
|
o
Researcher credibility
|
o
Summary assessment
|
week 5
This is a CLC assignment.
Follow the instructions provided in CLC Assignment:
Evidence-Based Project (EBP).
Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA
Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents
for this weeks CLC assignment.
While APA format is not required for the body of this
assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and
references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be
using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the
rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment
criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin,
unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the
Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin.
Synthesis Table Example
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
Name of Article
|
|
Levels of Evidence
|
||||
Study Design
|
||||
Variable to be studied
|
||||
Variable
to be studied
|
||||
Variable
to be studied
|
Compare template
above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most
important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the
design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As
you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of
BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the
provider to support standards of care.
Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery
week 6
Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research
Studies Instructions.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be
using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the
rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment
criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin,
unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the
Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin
Critique of Research
Studies Instructions
Directions:
Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative
articles that were submitted in Topic 3.
This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to
the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in
each part.
Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative
article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages
115-117 of the textbook or the Research Critique Additional Template Resource.
1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows
is the critique of the articles.
2) The side headings of the critique for each article should
follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3.
3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are
additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various
boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report.
Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology
appropriate to the critique of research.
When turning in the final submission, please put in thefollowing
order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References
(should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).
week 7
This is a CLC assignment.
Follow the instructions provided
"CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP)."
Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table
of Evidence, and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment.
Submit these documents at the completion of the CLC assignment.
While APA format is not required for
the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text
citations and references should be presented using APA documentation
guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student
Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading
rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment
to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful
completion of the assignment
NUR-504: Table of Evidence
Study
1
|
Study
2
|
Study
3
|
Study
4
|
Study
5
|
|
Author
|
|||||
Study
title
|
|||||
Research
Questions
|
|||||
Design
|
|||||
Setting/Sample
|
|||||
Methods:
intervention/instruments
|
|||||
Analysis
|
|||||
Key
findings
|
|||||
Recommendations
|
|||||
How
this supports EBP/Capstone
|
EBP Project Evaluation
___________________________________________________________________
week 8
Follow the instructions provided in
Critique of Research Studies instructions.
When turning in the final
submission, please put in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique,
Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the
text, and any other additional sources).
Prepare this assignment according to
the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center.
This assignment uses a grading
rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment
to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful
completion of the assignment.
You are not required to submit this
assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed,
refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be
submitted to Turnitin.
Critique of Research Studies
Instructions
Directions:
Complete a critique of the
quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3.
This assignment will be completed in
three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that
should be included in each part.
Follow the guidelines for the
quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages
112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook or the Research Critique
Additional Template Resource.
1) Utilize a central heading to
indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.
2) The side headings of the critique
for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3.
3) Note that within these BASIC
guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing
Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various
elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and
to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.
When turning in the final
submission, please put in thefollowing order: Quantitative Article Critique,
Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the
text, and any other additional sources).
Critique of Research Studies – Part
1: Due Topic 4
For Part 1 of the critique, focus
only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative
|
Qualitative
|
·
Title
|
·
Title
|
·
Abstract
|
·
Abstract
|
·
Introduction
|
·
Introduction
|
o
Statement of the problem
|
o
Statement of the problem
|
o
Hypotheses or research questions
|
o
Research questions
|
o
Literature review
|
o
Literature review
|
o
Conceptual/theoretical framework
|
o
Conceptual underpinnings
|
Critique of Research Studies – Part
2: Due Topic 6
For Part 2 of the critique, focus
only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative
|
Qualitative
|
·
Method
|
·
Method
|
o
Protection of human rights
|
o
Protection of participants’ rights
|
o
Research design
|
o
Research design and research tradition
|
o
Population and sample
|
o
Sample and setting
|
o
Data collection and measurement
|
o
Data collection
|
o
Procedures
|
o
Procedures
|
o
Enhancement of trustworthiness
|
Critique of Research Studies - Part
3: Due Topic 8
For Part 3 of the critique, focus
only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative
|
Qualitative
|
·
Results
|
·
Results
|
o
Data analysis
|
o
Data analysis
|
o
Findings
o
Reliability and Validity
|
o
Findings
|
·
Discussion
|
o
Theoretical integrations
|
o
Interpretation of findings
|
·
Discussion
|
o
Implications/recommendations
|
o
Interpretation of the findings
|
·
Global Issues
|
o
Implications/recommendations
|
o
Presentation
|
·
Global Issues
|
o
Researcher credibility
|
o
Presentation
|
o
Summary assessment
|
o
Researcher credibility
|
o
Summary assessment
|
No comments:
Post a Comment